• Slide 1

    Article Details

    Find, consult and hire the best Lawyers in India

Cheque Bounce - Signature Mismatch | Legal Resolved

2017-11-28 10:08:31
Cheque Bounce - Signature Mismatch | Legal Resolved

A man may confront criminal procedures if a cheque issued by him gets disrespected on the ground that his mark does not coordinate the example signature accessible with the bank, the Supreme Court has said.

A Bench of judges T.S. Thakur and Gyan Sudha Mishra put aside the decision of Gujarat High Court which had held that criminal procedures for disrespecting of check can be started just when the cheque is shamed in view of absence of adequate sum in the financial balance and not on the off chance that where a cheque is returned because of crisscross of mark of record holder.

 "Similarly as shame of a keep an eye on the ground that the record has been shut is a disrespect falling in the principal possibility alluded to in Section 138 of Negotiable Instrument Act, so likewise shame on the ground that the 'marks don't coordinate' or that the 'picture isn't discovered', which too suggests that the example marks don't coordinate the marks on the cheque would constitute a disrespect inside the significance of Section 138 of the Act," the seat said.

 "Disrespect by virtue of such changes that may happen over the span of customary business of an organization, association or an individual may not constitute an offense without anyone else in light of the fact that such a shame keeping in mind the end goal to meet all requirements for indictment under Section 138 should must be gone before by a statutory notice where the drawer is called upon and has the chance to mastermind the installment of the sum secured by the cheque," it said.

"In the event that the cheque shame is headstrong, the defaulter can be arraigned under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 or Sec 417 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) 1960. Under Section 138, the wronged gathering may send you a legitimate notice first. In the event that you are discovered liable as a hardheaded defaulter, you can be rebuffed with a jail term of two years as well as a fine as high as double the cheque sum," educates Shetty.

 Under Sec 417 and 420, a non-bailable quick warrant can be issued. Nonetheless, in both the cases, an instance of deceiving must be demonstrated. On the off chance that more than 1 cheque is bounced, the payee can record isolate suits against each disrespected cheque, which can compound issues for the defaulter.

 The payee, in any case, can't straight away go the lawful way. "He can re-show the returned cheque inside 3 months from the date of the cheque, giving another opportunity to the issuer. If it is restored the second time as well, at that point he can go the legitimate route within 30 days of the receipt of Cheque Return Memo. On receipt of a lawful notice or summons, the defaulter can settle the installment genially out of the court whenever or continue with a legal counselor for hearing, at the court where the protestation has been enlisted,"

LEGAL REMEDIES FOR PROPERTY DISPUTES

LEGAL REMEDIES FOR PROPERTY DISPUTES

13 February 2018   03 09 PM
Read More
Is builder reputation important for investing in real estate?

Is builder reputation important for investing in real estate?

30 January 2018   05 26 PM
Read More
REMEDIES FOR DELAYED POSSESSION UNDER RERA - Legal Resolved

REMEDIES FOR DELAYED POSSESSION UNDER RERA - Legal Resolved

27 January 2018   11 48 AM
Read More
What is the best way to handle cheating partner?

What is the best way to handle cheating partner?

25 January 2018   12 09 PM
Read More
HOW A LAWYER CAN HELP TO RESOLVE BUILDER DISPUTES?

HOW A LAWYER CAN HELP TO RESOLVE BUILDER DISPUTES?

23 January 2018   05 07 PM
Read More
BUILDER DISPUTE- NCDRC OR RERA?

BUILDER DISPUTE- NCDRC OR RERA?

16 January 2018   01 41 PM
Read More
Importance of filing a Legal Notice in India - Legal Resolved

Importance of filing a Legal Notice in India - Legal Resolved

09 January 2018   05 15 PM
Read More