• Slide 1

    GOLAKNATH CASE JUDGMENT

GOLAKNATH CASE JUDGMENT

25 July 2017

Overview

The Supreme Court in Sankari Prasad and Sajjan Singh had upheld the power of the State to amend the Constitution, including the provisions relating to Fundamental Rights, thus conferring wide powers on the Parliament. In the subsequent case of Golak Nath, the Supreme Court took a different stand and upheld the sanctity of Fundamental Rights above the power of State to amend the same.

Detail

Title of Case: I. C. Golaknath & Ors v State of Punjab & Anr

Citation: 1967 AIR 1643

Coram:

·         K. SUBBA RAO (CJ)

·         K.N.WANCHOO

·         M. HIDAYATULLAH

·         J.C.SHAH

·         S.M. SIKRI

·         R.S. BACHAWAT

·         V. RAMASWAMI

·         J.M. SHELAT

·         VISHISHTHA BHARGAVA

·         G.K. MITTER

·         C.A.VAIDYIALINGAM

 

Matter: Whether Fundamental Rights can be amended – power of Parliament to amend the Constitution

Brief Facts: The Punjab Security of Land Tenures Act (1953) and of the Mysore Land Reforms Act (1962) were challenged under Art 32 of the Constitution by the petitioners who were deprived of a few acres of their land under the impugned legislations. The 17th Constitution (Amendment) Act was also challenged as unconstitutional, as it enabled the inclusion of the impugned Acts in the 9th Schedule of the Constitution.

More than a mere battle on property and land, the friction between the Court and the Legislature began to become evident from here on ahead.

Court’s Decision: The Court held that Fundamental Rights cannot be abridged by the Parliament under the procedure given in Art.368. The Court also clarified that an Amendment to the Constitution is 'law' within the meaning of Art.  13(2) and is therefore subject to Part III of the Constitution.

Relevant Portions of the Judgment:

“….Fundamental rights are the primordial rights necessary for the development of human personality…”

“…The Constituent Assembly, it so minded, could certainly have conferred an express legislative power on Parliament to amend the Constitution by ordinary legislative process…”

“……The Constitution (Seventeenth Amendment) Act, 1964, inasmuch as it takes away or abridges fundamental rights was beyond 'the amending power of Parliament and void because of contravention of Art. 13(2)...”

Relevant Statutes (Indian Kanoon)

·         Constitution of India

·         17th Constitution (Amendment) Act

 

Asifa Rape and Murder Case; Trials to begin

16 April 2018   10 49 AM
Read More

The Latest Take by Madhya Pradesh HC: Disqualification of District Judge

12 April 2018   03 02 PM
Read More

RESULTS OF THE 1st LEGALRESOLVED COMMERCIAL & BUSINESS LAW ARTICLE WRITING COMPETITION, 2017

05 January 2018   11 19 PM
Read More

Scandals that put Indian politicians in the Line of Fire in 2017

31 August 2017   02 40 PM
Read More

A MOVE TO CURB HONOUR KILLINGS

09 August 2017   11 04 AM
Read More

NOW AADHAAR WILL FOLLOW YOU TO THE GRAVE!

08 August 2017   12 09 PM
Read More

498-A: Recent Supreme Court Judgment

02 August 2017   10 27 AM
Read More